A Framework for Delivering Digital Sovereignty and a More Competitive Europe

This year has seen digital sovereignty rise to the forefront of the global tech conversation. Owing to increased geopolitical and economic shocks, sovereignty concerns are intensifying, rather than being deprioritized. Many European organizations are currently assessing their dependency on foreign technology at a time that is decisive for continental relations.

This shift in thinking around digital independence is leading to a profound change in the psychology and perception of tech sovereignty amongst key decision makers. Understandably, conversations are turning to focus on questions around autonomy, data protection, and control over digital infrastructure. These concerns are valid, and it’s critical that as US organizations, we listen to them, and act upon them to work with Europe on Europe’s terms.

Defining digital sovereignty

Amongst all this uncertainty and shifting dynamics, the good news is that the technology to support this change exists and is already in use and proving its worth. However, digital sovereignty as a topic is constructively ambiguous and not standardized across the continent. So, before explaining how to deliver digital sovereignty and where Zero Trust security fits in, it’s worth taking a moment to define it in a manner that makes it concrete and actionable across Europe.

This is where the 5C approach becomes particularly useful. Acting as a practical way to define digital sovereignty, the 5Cs help organizations to move away from thinking of it as a vague political idea, and into a set of concrete expectations that customers can use to assess technology providers. To explain them in more detail:

• Choice: Customers must be able to choose providers without vendor lock-in. European customers want freedom of choice and interoperability, and sovereignty starts by not being structurally locked in with a single vendor through licenses or closed ecosystems.
• Control: A customer and crucially not a vendor must have full control over their data and their systems. They’ve got to know where their data is residing, be in control of who can access it, and how those systems are secured.
• Continuity: Customers need assurance that they can continue to operate when geopolitical or legal disruptions occur. The focus here must be on providing business continuity, not just cyber resilience. Essentially, the goal is to give customers a set amount of time (e.g. 90-180 days) to find alternatives if access is disrupted.
• Collaboration: European partners want US technology providers to partner with trusted local companies, not act alone. Collaboration helps reduce political concern and increases trust in large public-sector or regulated contracts, while also supporting technology transfer and ecosystem development in Europe.
• Compliance: Technology providers must be compliant by default in line with global, regional, and local regulations. Sovereignty means meeting regulatory requirements automatically, without customers having to retrofit compliance afterwards.

By reducing dependency risk, keeping customers in charge of their data and operations, ensuring resiliency, championing local ecosystems, and meeting regulatory obligations, the 5C framework provides European companies with the ability to remain or regain sovereignty. When approached in the correct manner, digital sovereignty can act as a springboard for a more competitive Europe.

Delivering digital sovereignty

At its core, digital sovereignty is about being in control of data, staying independent, ensuring service continuity and demanding transparency. A Zero Trust platform approach for security underpins this ambition because it replaces the implicit trust in networks with continuous verification of every user and device. Through local processing and compliance with granular access controls, it’s uniquely positioned to support autonomy goals by keeping log data in Europe and providing real-time threat protection and secure access during disruptions.

Creating a more competitive Europe

Europe’s competitiveness agenda to a large extent runs through digital capacity, productivity, and resilience. The infamous Draghi report reflects the urgency - referencing technology and digitalisation more than 750 times - and frames digital investment as central to Europe’s economic strategy in a more contested environment. But let's be honest: Competitiveness without digital sovereignty is an anachronism. The tech industry has a responsibility to deliver on that agenda. A practical approach to digital sovereignty- choice and interoperability, control, continuity, trusted partnerships, and compliance by design - is the recipe that can both help reduce dependency risks while keeping Europe innovative and globally competitive.